MPI-CBG LMF short strategy points

From BioDIP
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
no official policy here.... just Dan thinking about stuff....
+
WARNING!!!! ...no official policy here.... just Dan thinking about stuff....
  
 
==Coming Situation==
 
==Coming Situation==

Revision as of 14:38, 10 February 2010

WARNING!!!! ...no official policy here.... just Dan thinking about stuff....

Contents

Coming Situation

  • Increasing equipment/staff ratio - decreased user response time
  • SAB says Services and Facilities should not increase in size.

Food queue analogy: Equipment/Users = those in queue. Staff = Cooks. Even with more fancy ovens, cooks only push out food so fast. With more queuing items... queue just gets longer ... slower response time - user frustration.

Recharge Mechanism

  • Shows where demand is.
  • Resources should follow demand
  • Resources are limited and must be allocated according to demand and other criteria (eg?)

Conundrum

SAB says no more staff in services and facilities - but recharge mechanism and equipment/staff ratio indicate requirement for more staff.

Solutions

  1. Retire older - less used - LMF equipment
  • Reduces equipment/staff ratio
  • Support for some systems is lost.
  1. Use staff resources more efficiently
  • Wiki to share/retain info for staff and users
  • Share user project information within the team (UP: emails to lmf and ipf)
  • internal training to increase bus number
  • more small group teaching
  1. Find a way to hire more staff
  • SAB report suggests against this
  • resources are limited
  • but when directors want something - they find ways to make it happen.
  1. Redefine LMF responsibilities
  • teaching and training
  • research of new technology.
  • only or also support new or old technology
  • Do or Don't get involved in user projects at the experimental design / equipment choice level
Personal tools