MPI-CBG LMF short strategy points
From BioDIP
(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | no official policy here.... just Dan thinking about stuff.... | + | WARNING!!!! ...no official policy here.... just Dan thinking about stuff.... |
==Coming Situation== | ==Coming Situation== |
Revision as of 14:38, 10 February 2010
WARNING!!!! ...no official policy here.... just Dan thinking about stuff....
Contents |
Coming Situation
- Increasing equipment/staff ratio - decreased user response time
- SAB says Services and Facilities should not increase in size.
Food queue analogy: Equipment/Users = those in queue. Staff = Cooks. Even with more fancy ovens, cooks only push out food so fast. With more queuing items... queue just gets longer ... slower response time - user frustration.
Recharge Mechanism
- Shows where demand is.
- Resources should follow demand
- Resources are limited and must be allocated according to demand and other criteria (eg?)
Conundrum
SAB says no more staff in services and facilities - but recharge mechanism and equipment/staff ratio indicate requirement for more staff.
Solutions
- Retire older - less used - LMF equipment
- Reduces equipment/staff ratio
- Support for some systems is lost.
- Use staff resources more efficiently
- Wiki to share/retain info for staff and users
- Share user project information within the team (UP: emails to lmf and ipf)
- internal training to increase bus number
- more small group teaching
- Find a way to hire more staff
- SAB report suggests against this
- resources are limited
- but when directors want something - they find ways to make it happen.
- Redefine LMF responsibilities
- teaching and training
- research of new technology.
- only or also support new or old technology
- Do or Don't get involved in user projects at the experimental design / equipment choice level